Information

8: Shoot Anatomy and Morphology - Biology

8: Shoot Anatomy and Morphology - Biology


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

8: Shoot Anatomy and Morphology

Morphology and Anatomy of Shoot, Root, and Propagation Systems in Hoffmannseggia glauca

Abstract: Hoffmannseggia glauca is a perennial weed that has tubers and root-borne buds. Some authors only consider root tubers without mentioning root-borne buds, while others consider that more anatomic studies become necessary to determine the origin of these structures and to interpret their behaviour. The objectives are: to study the growth form of the plant in order to analyze the ontogeny of its propagation organs, and to study its shoot and root anatomical characters that affect water conductivity. Hoffmannseggia glauca was collected in Argentina. Development of its shoot and root systems was observed. Shoots and roots were processed to obtain histological slides. Macerations were prepared to study vessel members. Primary and lateral roots originate buds that develop shoots at the end of the first year. In winter, aerial parts die and only latent buds at soil surface level and subterranean organs remain. In the following spring, they develop innovation shoots. Roots show localized swellings (tuberous roots), due to a pronounced increase of ray thickness and parenchymatous proliferation in the root center. Root vessel members are wider than those of aerial and subterranean shoots. Early development of an extensive root system, presence of root borne buds, anatomic and physiological specialization of innovation shoots, capability of parenchymatous rays to originate buds and tuberous roots, and high water transport efficiency in subterranean organs lead Hoffmannseggia glauca to display higher colonization potential than other species.


Shoot Anatomy and Morphology

This chapter discusses the anatomy and morphology of cacti shoot, focusing primarily on its cellular characteristics and biomechanical properties. The shoot consists of internodes, nodes where leaves are attached, and axillary buds (the spine-producing areoles). The bud scales and leaves of axillary buds are the signature spines of cacti. The ability of cacti to adapt to xeric conditions is due to increases in water-storage tissue, especially in the cortex and wood, thickened cuticles, and the presence of a hypodermis. The fundamental tissue, cortex and pith, carries out two important functions related to xeric adaptations: photosynthesis and water storage.

California Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .


Lycopodium: Habit and Habitat and Morphology

In this article we will discuss about:- 1. Habit and Habitat of Lycopodium 2. External Morphology of Lycopodium 3. Internal Structure 4. Reproduction 5. Morphological Nature of Protocorm 6. Economic Importance 7. Life Cycle Patterns.

Habit and Habitat of Lycopodium:

Lycopodium is commonly known as ‘club moss’ due to their moss like appearance and club shaped strobili. It has about 400 species, which are cosmopolitan in distribution. They are found in colder arctic region as well as in temperate, tropical and sub-tropical regions but they are abundantly found in tropical zones.

Thirty three species of Lycopodium have been reported from India. Mostly it is found growing in moist and shady places which are rich in humus and other organic matters. Some of the common species are L. clavatum, L. phlegmaria, L. cernuum, etc.

It has got 2 sub-genuses:

(i) Urostachya—branching dichotomous and roots originate from the base of the stem.

(ii) Rhopalostachya—stem prostrate with erect branching and roots arise adventitiously from all along the stem.

Mostly the tropical species are epiphytic (e.g., L. phlegmaria) and grow hanging from the tree trunks. The temperate species may be erect and shruby (e.g., L. reflexum), creeping (e.g., L clavatum) or erect form (e.g., L. cernuum) etc.

External Morphology of Lycopodium:

The herbaceous plant body is sporophytic. Usually they may have either prostrate stem with erect leafy branches or weak pendent stem (epiphytes).

The plant body is distinctly differentiated into following three regions (Fig. 1 A-C):

In the sub-genus Urostachya stem is erect (terrestrial) or pendent (epiphytic) and may be branched (dichotomously) or unbranched. In the sub-genus Rhopalostachya the stem is prostrate with erect branches. First the branching is dichotomous and later on becomes monopodial.

Usually small, adventitious roots are present. In the sub-genus Urostachya roots originate only from the base of the stem (not arising from the whole length of the stem). In some species e.g., L. selago etc. the roots arise endogenously from pericycle of the stem, do not penetrate the cortex of the stem but turn downward through the cortex and finally emerge only at the base of the stem.

Due to this reason a T. S. of stem usually shows roots within the cortex and are known as cortical roots (inner roots). In sub-genus Rhopalostachya also roots are adventitious and arise all along the underside of the prostrate portion of the stem.

Leaves are simple, sessile, small in size, eligulate and possess a single unbranched midrib and are known as microphylls. Usually the leaves are spirally arranged (e.g., L. clavatum) but may be arranged in whorls (e.g., L. cernuum) or pairs (e.g., L. alpinum).

In all the cases they condensely cover the surface of the stem. Leaves are usually homophyllous (isophyllous) i.e., of same size and shape but in some cases e.g., in L. complanatum the leaves are heterophyllous (anisophyllous) i.e., of different size.

Usually the leaves near the apical portion of the branches bear sporangia and are called sporophylls. Depending upon the species the sporophylls may or may not be differentiated from the ordinary leaves.

These sporophylls usually form a condense structure at the apex of the branches which are known as strobili. The numbers of strobili at the tip of branches differ in different species.

Internal Structure of Lycopodium:

A transverse section (T.S.) of the stem of Lycopodium is somewhat circular in outline and can be differentiated into following three regions:

It is the outermost covering layer comprising of single cell in thickness. The epidermis is cutinised on the outer side and interrupted at places by the presence of stomata.

Inner to the epidermis is present a wide zone of cortex which shows a great variation in its structure in different species.

Usually four types of cortex are recognized:

(i) The whole of the cortex is made up of parenchymatous cells with small or large intercellular spaces (e.g., L. selago). Such cortex is called homogeneous.

(ii) The whole of the cortex is made up of sclerenchymatous cells, without intercellular spaces.

(iii) The cortex is differentiated into outer and inner sclerenchymatous cells and middle parenchymatous cells (e.g., L. clavatum, Fig. 2 A).

(iv) The cortex is differentiated into outer and inner parenchymatous cells and middle sclerenchymatous cells (e.g., L. cernuum Fig. 2. B).

Next to the cortex is present a single layer of well-defined cells known as endodermis with conspicuous casparian strips but at maturity the endodermis may or may not be a distinct structure. Endodermis is followed by pericycle which is composed of one or more layers of compactly arranged parenchymatous cells.

It is made up of only primary xylem and primary phloem. It is a protostele i.e., pith is absent and the stele is situated in the centre. The arrangement of xylem and phloem tissues is different in different species and the stele is also named differently.

In case of L. serratum, L. phlegmaria etc. the xylem is star shaped with a protoxylem situated at the periphery (protoxylem exarch Fig. 3 A). In L. annotinum in actinostele the furrows in the xylem are much more and show stellate arrangement (Fig. 3B).

The phloem lays in the space between the xylem rays. This type of stele is known as actinostele. In case of L. clavatum. L. volubile etc. xylem appears to be in the form of separate plates arranged somewhat parallel, with phloem in between them.

This type of stele is known as plectostele (Fig. 2 A, 3 C). In case of L. cernuum, L. drummondii etc. xylem and phloem are uniformly distributed i.e. it appears as if strands of xylem are embedded in the phloem. This type of stele is known as mixed protostele (Fig. 2 B, 3 D).

The protoxylem is usually exarch in all the cases. Xylem is usually composed of tracheids and phloem of sieve tubes and phloem parenchyma. Cambium is absent hence there is no secondary growth i.e., no formation of secondary xylem and secondary phloem.

The roots are adventitious.

A transverse section (T.S.) of the aerial root of Lycopodium is somewhat circular in outline and shows the following internal structure:

It is the outermost covering layer and is only one cell thick. The cells are thin walled. Epidermis is provided with numerous root hairs present in pairs (characteristic of Lycopodium).

Just below the epidermis is present a wide zone of cortex. It is differentiated into outer sclerenchyma and inner parenchyma. The outer one gives the mechanical strength to the root.

It may be di-, tetra-, or polyarch. In prostrate species it is polyarch i.e., having 6-10 plates of xylem arranged radially (star shaped). The xylem is exarch. The phloem is present between the radiating arms of xylem. In erect or pendent species stele is diarch or tetrarch. In L.selago, L. serratum it is diarch and xylem is C, U or crescent shaped. The phloem is present between the 2 ends of xylem, only in one group.

The cortical roots are exactly similar in their internal structure to that of aerial roots, except that the epidermis and root hairs are absent.

The xylem is composed of tracheid and phloem of sieve tubes and phloem parenchyma. The endodermis and pericycle are indistinct structure at maturity. Pith and cambium are absent.

T. S. of the leaf shows epidermis, mesophyll tissue and a single median vascular bundle:

It is the outermost surrounding layer and is only one cell in thickness. The cells of epidermis are parenchymatous and cutinised on their outer side. The epidermis is also interrupted by the presence of stomata. In homophyllous (isophyllous) species the stomata are present on outer as well as inner epidermis (amphistomatic) but in heterophyllous (anisophyllous) species the stomata are mostly restricted on the lower epidermis (hypostomatic).

It occupies a wide zone between the epidermis and the vascular bundle. It is usually made up of thin walled chlorenchymatous cells which may be with or without intercellular spaces.

In the centre of the leaf is situated only a single concentric vascular bundle made up of only xylem and phloem. The vascular bundle is surrounded on all sides by a sclerenchymatous sheath.

Reproduction in Lycopodium:

Lycopodium reproduces by two methods vegetatively and by spores.

1. Vegetative reproduction:

It takes place by the following methods:

In a few species like L. selago, L. lucidulum etc. certain buds like structures known as gemmae or bulbils are usually produced in large number on new stem tips annually. The morphological nature of gemmae is still not fully known. The gemmae when fall on ground, develop root primodia and soon form the root.

(ii) Death and decay:

Species with creeping stem reproduces vegetatively by the death and decay of older parts of the stem up to the point of branching. This separates the branches which later on grow independently.

(iii) Resting buds:

In L. inundatum the whole of the plant body except the growing tip of rhizome is dead during winter. This tip portion of the rhizome acts as resting bud which in the coming spring resumes growth and develops into a new plant.

(iv) Fragmentation:

In several epiphytic species fragments of the plant body are capable of giving rise to new plants.

2. Sexual Reproduction:

Spore Producing Organs:

Lycopodium is a sporophytic plant and reproduces sexually. The plants are homosporous i.e., produces only one type of spores (without differentiation of mega- and microspores). These spores are produced in sporangia which, in turn, are produced on fertile leaves known as sporophylls. Usually the sporophylls are grouped together to form a compact structure known as strobili (Sing. strobilus) which are terminal structures (Fig. 1 A).

Strobilus (Reproductive organ):

In the primitive species of the sub-genus Urostachya every leaf on the plant is a sporophyll or at least potentially so and the fertile and sterile zones alternate. The sporophylls are loosely arranged. In species of Rhopalostachya and in some species of Urostachya the leaves of the apical portion of the branches only bear sporangia and are called sporophylls. The rest behave as vegetative leaves.

The sporophylls may be of the same size or of different size from the foliage leaves in different species. The arrangement of sporophylls is same on the central axis as that of the vegetative leaves on the stem i.e., spiral, whorled or decussate etc.

The position of the sporangium is also different in different species. The sporangia may be axillary and protected with the help of sporophylls (e.g., L. inundatum Fig. 7 A) or foliar and protected (e.g., L. cernuum Fig. 7 B) or subfoliar and exposed (e.g., L. squarrosum, Fig. 7 C) or axillary and exposed (e.g., L. lucidulum, Fig. 7 D).

Longitudinal section (L.S.) of strobilus shows the presence of a strobilus axis in the centre. On both sides of the strobilus axis are present sporophylls (Fig. 8 A). Each sporophyll bears only one sporangium (Fig. 8 B). All the sporangia are similar in structure and are arranged acropetally in a strobilus i.e., the youngest are at the top (Fig. 8 C).

Structure of Sporangium:

Sporangia are sac-like structures but usually kidney shaped in appearance (Fig. 8 B). Sometimes they are sub-spherical in appearance. Their colour varies from orange to yellow. Each sporangium consists of a basal short massive stalk i.e., sub-sessile, with an upper globular unilocular body containing numerous spores.

The body of the sporangium consists of 3 or more layers of wall surrounding a cavity. The inner most layer of the wall of sporangium is called as tapetum (Fig. 9 F) which is nutritive in nature and persists till maturity.

In the young sporangium inside the wall is present a mass of sporogenous cells which in due course of development form spore mother cells which by meiotic divisions, produce haploid tetrad of spores. The spores at maturity separate from each other.

The wall of the sporangium is provided with a transverse strip of cells known as stomium from where the sporangium at maturity splits into 2 valves and the spores are dispersed away in the air.

The spores produced by a sporangium are all alike (homosporous). They are small, rounded or even spherical structures. The surface of the spores is usually rough due to the presence of reticulate ridges or knob like protrusions. Each spore is provided with a triradiate ridge (Fig. 8, D, E) and is somewhat yellow in colour. A small amount of chlorophyll may or may not be present in spores. Reserve food is in the form of oil in the spores.

Development of sporangium and formation of spores. Bower (1894) had studied the development of sporangium in Lycopodium. The sporangium develops from a small group of superficial cells arranged in a transverse row on the adaxial side of the sporophyll near the base.

Its development is of eusporangiate type. These superficial cells are called sporangial initials (Fig. 9A, B). These cells divide by periclinal divisions forming an outer and inner layer of cells. The outer cells divide periclinally and anticlinally forming three celled thick wall of the sporangium (Fig. 9A-F).

The inner layer or archesporial cells divide in all directions forming a group of cells known as sporogenous tissue which finally give rise to spore mother cells. During these developments the inner-most layer of wall is differentiated as a nutritive layer and is known as tapetum. It is a persistent structure and rich in reserve food material.

Each spore mother cell undergoes a process of meiosis thus producing a tetrad of spores (haploid) with tetrahedral arrangement. These spores later on separate from the tetrad, as a result of which, a large number of spores are produced inside each mature sporangium.

Dehiscence of sporangium and liberation of spores. As the sporangium approaches towards maturity, a transverse row of cells is differentiated near the apical portion from the wall of a sporangium known as stomium.

The walls of the cell of stomium thicken and differ from the walls of other cells of the sporangium. As the sporangium loses water, it creates a pressure on the wall which leads to the appearance of slit in the stomium as a result of which the wall splits opens into two halves and the spores are disseminated by air current.

Gametophytic Generation:

The development of the gametophyte (prothallus) takes place from the haploid spores which are the unit of gametophytic generation. Each spore is unicellular, uninucleate haploid structure, 0.03 mm in diameter and surrounded by 2 layers, with a triradiate ridge at the surface (Fig. 8 D, E).

Chlorophyll may or may not be present in different species. In few species spores may germinate within a few days after liberation but in some species the spores germinate when they are 3-8 years old and the development of gametophyte upto formation of mature sex organs may take a time of 8 months to 6 or even 15 years.

The rate of the formation of photosynthetic tissue is usually proportional to the rate of growth of gametophyte. Both the male and female reproductive organs are produced on the same gametophyte. The male sex organs are produced earlier than female sex organs.

Usually at the time of germination of spore, it swells up to absorb water. First the spore divides into two unequal cells by a lenticular division, forming a very small lens shaped cell known as rhizoidal cell and a bigger cell (Fig. 10 A, B).

This rhizoidal cell takes no part in further development of gametophyte and is a colourless structure. At this two celled stage the spore will rupture at the triradiate ridge. Second division divides the bigger cell into two equal halves, the cell near the rhizoidal cell is known as basal cell and the other one is known as upper cell (Fig. 10 C).

The upper cell further divides by two successive divisions in such a way as to form an apical cell with two cutting faces (Fig. 10 D). At this stage the gametophyte is 5 celled structures and the symbiotic phycomycetous fungus (mycorrhizal fungus) attacks it.

If this fungus fails to attack at this stage, further development of gametophyte stops. This infection takes place through the basal cell. During further course of development of gametophyte the apical cell further divides to form six or morecells which later on develop into meristematic cells. These cells, by further divisions form a multicellular structure, the gametophyte (prothallus) (Fig 10 E-H).

Structure of the Mature Gametophytes:

The form and structure of the gametophytes varies greatly in different species.

In general they have been grouped under three categories:

Type I or Cernuum type:

Gametophyte is partially aerial and partly in soil. The prothalli are usually 2 to 3 millimetre in height and 1-2 millimetre in diameter. The gametophytes (prothalli) grow at the surface of the ground and consist of a colourless basal portion buried in soil and a conspicuous upright, fleshy, green aerial portion having lobes (Fig. 11 A).

The sex organs develop between the green expanding lobes. The prothallus itself is a nourishing body. The underground part contains endophytic fungus e.g., L. cernuum, L. inundatum etc.

Type II or Clavatum Type:

The gametophyte is wholly subterranean and totally saprophytic i.e., non- green structure. It is tuberous and without lobes. It may be one to two centimentre long or wide and is top shaped, conical or discoid in shape (Fig. 11 B, C). The endophytic fungus is present. Sex organs are formed on the upper surface e.g. L. annotinum, L. complanatum, L. clavatum etc.

Type III or Phlegmaria type:

The gametophyte is subterranean, saprophytic and colourless. This type of prothallus is seen in L. phlegmaria and other epiphytic species. The prothallus is about 2 millimeter in diameter and monopodially branched (Fig. 11 D). Sex organs are borne on upper surface of large branches and are interspersed with slender filaments known as paraphyses.

Besides these three forms some intermediate forms of prothalli are also observed. In L. selago the prothalli may be subterranean or epiterranean (aerial). If the spores are buried under the soil after liberation, they form subterranean prothalli and if the spores are not buried under soil after their liberation, they form epiterranean prothalli.

The internal structure of the prothallus is very simple. The outermost layer is epidermis, followed by cortical mycorrhizal region, palisade region and central storage region. It is attached with the substratum by unicellular rhizoids. The prothalli of all species are monoecious i.e., antheridia and archegonia develop on the same prothallus.

Development of sex organs:

Both the sex organs i.e., antheridia (male) and archegonia (female) develop on the same prothallus, usually in distinct patches on the upper surface. The gametophytes are protandrous i.e., antheridia develop before archegonia. Sex organs develop just on the back of the apical meristem.

Development of antheridium:

A single superficial cell situated just away from the meristematic cells gives rise to an antheridium. This superficial cell is known as antheridial initial (Fig. 12 A). This cell divides periclinally to form an outer cell known as jacket initial (primary wall cell) and an inner cell known as primary androgonial initial or cell (Fig. 12 B).

The jacket initial divides only anticlinally by several divisions resulting in the formation of single layered covering known as jacket layer. In the middle of the jacket layer a triangular cell is differentiated, which is known as opercular cell.

Simultaneously, the primary androgonial divides by various divisions, forming a mass of cells embedded in the prothallus, known as androgonial cells which finally give rise to androcytes (antherozoid mother cells, Fig. 12 C-F). The number of androcytes per antheridium varies in different species.

Each androcyte later on metamorphosis into a biflagellated antherozoid. Each antherozoid is a haploid, uninucleate, fusiform structure with broad rounded posterior end and an upper pointed biflagellated anterior end (Fig- 12 G).

The triangular opercular cell becomes mucilaginous as a result of which an opening is formed at the apex of antheridium through which water enters into it. The antherozoids absorb water and swell up as a result of which a pressure is created on the wall of antheridium which finally ruptures and the antherozoids are liberated.

Development of archegonium:

Just like antheridium, the archegonium also arises from a single superficial cell called archegonial initial, situated just away from the meristematic cells at the apex (Fig. 13 A). The archegonial initial divides by periclinal division into an upper primary cover cell and lower basal central cell (Fig. 13 B).

The primary cover cell later on divides vertically by two successive divisions at right angle to each other forming four neck initials which later on by transverse divisions form a 3-4 cells high neck. Each tier of the neck consists of 4 cells.

The central cell divides transversely forming an, upper primary canal cell and a lower primary ventral cell (Fig. 13 D). The primary canal cell by successive transverse divisions produces a variable number of neck canal cells (usually one in L. cernuum, seven in, L. selago and 14-16 in L. complanatum).

The primary ventral cell may directly behave as an egg or may divide transversely to form an upper ventral canal cell and a lower egg (Fig. 13 E-G). The egg is somewhat broader then the rest part of archegonium. The archegonial jacket is absent. The archegonium is a sunken flask shaped structure with neck projecting out of the prothallus.

At the time of fertilization the neck canal cells and the ventral canal cell disorganise and the cells of the upper-most tier of neck slightly separate apart forming a passage upto the egg (Fig. 13 H). Fertilization is brought about in the presence of water.

The biflagellate antherozoids reach the archegonium by swimming in water on the surface of prothallus. The antherozoids are perhaps attracted towards the neck of archegonium by a chemotactic movement. They enter the archegonium through neck and reach the egg.

Only the nucleus of one antherozoid fuses with the egg nucleus thus forming a diploid structure-known as oospore (2x). The act of fertilization ends the gametophytic generation and the initial stage of sporophytic generation is formed.

Embryo Development (Young Sporophyte):

The rate of development of the embryo is extremely slow. In Lycopodium embryo develops downward into the gametophytic tissue instead of developing upward i.e., towards the neck of archegonium. The first division of the oospore is always transverse, forming an upper cell (epibasal) and a lower cell (hypobasal) known as embryonic cell.

The upper cell does not divide further and behaves as suspensor. The lower cell (embryonic cell) divides by two vertical divisions at right angle to each other, followed by a transverse division, forming 8 cells (octant, Fig. 14 A-D). The 4 cells of the octant, situated near the suspensor by further division, form a multicellular foot which acts as a haustorium and helps in the absorption of food material from the gametophytic tissue.

Out of the 4 remaining cells of the octant, the 2 cells towards the meristematic region give rise to stem and the other 2 cells give rise to primary leaf and primary root (Fig. 14 D-J). The primary stem is short lived and is replaced by adventitious outgrowth which gives rise to horizontal stem. More roots develop from the stem.

The primary roots of the sporophyte are exogenous in origin while those arising later on are endogenous in origin. The embryo obtains its nourishment for a long time from the gametophyte.

In some species e.g., L. cernuum etc. the gametophyte is generally green. The oospore normally divides transversely forming suspensor and embryonic cell. The embryonic cell forms an octant. The tier which gives rise to stem, leaf and primary roots, develops into a massive spherical structure of parenchymatous cells, known as protocorm (Fig. 14 K, L).

It grows through the gametophyte, becomes green and develops rhizoids on its lower surface. The upper surface of the protocorm gives rise to a few to many erect outgrowths which are leaf like and are known as protophylls.

The protophylls are provided with stomata. At this stage the protocorm separates from the gametophyte. Now at the upper side of protocorm a region is differentiated which develops into stem. Protocorm is regarded as the intermediate phase in between normal embryo and definite leafy shoot.

Morphological Nature of Protocorm of Lycopodium:

Various views have been put forward to explain the morphological nature of protocorm of Lycopodium.

A few important ones are discussed below:

(1) Treub (1837) regarded the protocrorm as the remains of primitive undifferentiated structure originally possessed by the Pteridophytes and in majority of the present day Pteridophytes it has been replaced by a definite leafy shoot. This view is now only of historical importance.

(2) Bower (1908, 1935) regarded it as a swelling of occasional adaptation. It acts as an organ of perennation. It has no phylogenetic importance.

(3) Holloway (1910) regarded it as a specialised structure that helps the young sporophyte to perennate over dry season.

(4) Browne (1913) regarded it as a modified and a reduced stem.

(5) Wardlaw (1955) regarded it as a modified shoot.

Economic Importance of Lycopodium:

Different species of Lycopodium are differently important as for example, some species of Lycopodium (L. obscurum) are used in making Christmas wreaths. L. volubile is used for table decoration.

Extract from the plant of Lycopodium was used as kidney stimulant in the old times. The spores of Lycopodium are highly inflammable and have been used to produce stage lighting, for the theatres. The spores of L. clavatum etc. are used in pharmacy as water repellent protective dusting powder for tender skin etc.

Life Cycle Patterns in Lycopodium:

Lycopodium is a sporophyte (2x) with distinct sporophytic (2x) and gametophytic (x) generations which alternate with each other. The plant is homosporous i.e., reproduces by producing only one type of spores. The spore on germination produces gametophyte (x) which, in turn, produces both antherozoids and eggs in antheridia and archegonia respectively.

These reproductive structures later on after fertilization produce zygote (2x) which again on germination gives rise to a sporophytic plant (2x). In this way sporophytic and gametophytic generations alternate with each other and it shows a distinct alternation of generation although the sporophytic phase is dominant over gametophytic phase (Fig. 15).


2 - Morphology, anatomy, and classification of the Bryophyta

With approximately 13 000 species, the Bryophyta compose the second most diverse phylum of land plants. Mosses share with the Marchantiophyta and Anthocerotophyta a haplodiplobiontic life cycle that marks the shift from the haploid-dominated life cycle of the algal ancestors of embryophytes to the sporophyte-dominated life cycle of vascular plants. The gametophyte is free-living, autotrophic, and almost always composed of a leafy stem. Following fertilization a sporophyte develops into an unbranched axis bearing a terminal spore-bearing capsule. The sporophyte remains physically attached to the gametophyte and is at least partially physiologically dependent on the maternal plant. Recent phylogenetic reconstructions suggest that three lineages of early land plants compose an evolutionary grade that spans the transition to land and the origin of plants with branched sporophytes (see Chapter 4). The Bryophyta seem to occupy an intermediate position: their origin predates the divergence of the ancestor to the hornworts and vascular plants but evolved from a common ancestor with liverworts (Qiu et al . 2006). The origin of the earliest land plants can be traced back to the Ordovician and maybe the Cambrian (Strother et al . 2004). Although unambiguous fossils of mosses have only been recovered from sediments dating from younger geological periods (Upper Carboniferous), divergence time estimates based on molecular phylogenies suggest that the origin of mosses dates back to the Ordovician (Newton et al . 2007) and thus that their unique evolutionary history spans at least 400 million years.

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.


Morphology of Limulus

Horseshoe crabs live primarily in and around shallow coastal waters on soft sandy or muddy bottoms. They occasionally come onto shore to mate. Horseshoe crabs superficially resemble crustaceans but belong to a separate subphylum of the arthropods, Chelicerata, and are closely related to arachnids. Horseshoe crabs are closely related to the extinct eurypterids (sea scorpions), which include some of the largest arthropods to have ever existed, and the two may be sister groups. The earliest horseshoe crab fossils are found in strata from the late Ordovician period, roughly 450 million years ago.

Morphology of a limulus (horseshoe crab): marine arthopod which lives near the shore.
Frontal organ: organ of the horseshoe crab situated at face-level.
Chelicera: a pair of venomous hooks situated on the head of a horseshoe crab.
Walking leg: floating appendage.
Genital operculum: structure covering the opening to the genital organs.
Transverse auricular groove: shallow impression related to the ear.
Appendages modified to serve as gills: leaf-shaped leg.
Auricular cavity of the tail spine: cavity related to the flexibility and movement of the telson.
Telson (tail spine): barb at the end of the horseshoe crabs tail.
Abdomen: posterior part of the body of a horseshoe crab.
Mobile spine: movable tail of the horseshoe crab.
Cephalothorax: head and thorax of the horseshoe crab, which together form one section of the body.
Eye: sight organ of a horseshoe crab.
Ocelli: rudimentary eye.


Contents

The etymology of the word "morphology" is from the Ancient Greek μορφή ( morphḗ ), meaning "form", and λόγος ( lógos ), meaning "word, study, research". [2] [3]

While the concept of form in biology, opposed to function, dates back to Aristotle (see Aristotle's biology), the field of morphology was developed by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1790) and independently by the German anatomist and physiologist Karl Friedrich Burdach (1800). [4]

In 1830, Cuvier and E.G.Saint-Hilaire engaged in a famous debate, which is said to exemplify the two major deviations in biological thinking at the time – whether animal structure was due to function or evolution. [7]

    is analysis of the patterns of the locus of structures within the body plan of an organism, and forms the basis of taxonomical categorization. is the study of the relationship between the structure and function of morphological features.
  • Experimental morphology is the study of the effects of external factors upon the morphology of organisms under experimental conditions, such as the effect of genetic mutation. is a "branch of morphology that deals with the structure of organisms". [8]
  • Molecular morphology is a rarely used term, usually referring to the superstructure of polymers such as fiber formation [9] or to larger composite assemblies. The term is commonly not applied to the spatial structure of individual molecules.
  • Gross morphology refers to the collective structures of an organism as a whole as a general description of the form and structure of an organism, taking into account all of its structures without specifying an individual structure.

Most taxa differ morphologically from other taxa. Typically, closely related taxa differ much less than more distantly related ones, but there are exceptions to this. Cryptic species are species which look very similar, or perhaps even outwardly identical, but are reproductively isolated. Conversely, sometimes unrelated taxa acquire a similar appearance as a result of convergent evolution or even mimicry. In addition, there can be morphological differences within a species, such as in Apoica flavissima where queens are significantly smaller than workers. A further problem with relying on morphological data is that what may appear, morphologically speaking, to be two distinct species, may in fact be shown by DNA analysis to be a single species. The significance of these differences can be examined through the use of allometric engineering in which one or both species are manipulated to phenocopy the other species.

A step relevant to the evaluation of morphology between traits/features within species, includes an assessment of the terms: homology and homoplasy. Homology between features indicate that those features have been derived from a common ancestor. [10] Alternatively, homoplasy between features describes those that can resemble each other, but derive independently via parallel or convergent evolution. [11]

Invention and development of microscopy enable the observation of 3-D cell morphology with both high spatial and temporal resolution. The dynamic processes of these cell morphology which are controlled by a complex system play an important role in varied important biological process, such as immune and invasive responses. [12] [13]


TCP transcription factors control the morphology of shoot lateral organs via negative regulation of the expression of boundary-specific genes in Arabidopsis

Plants form shoot meristems in the so-called boundary region, and these meristems are necessary for normal morphogenesis of aerial parts of plants. However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the formation of shoot meristems are not fully understood. We report here that expression of a chimeric repressor from TCP3 (TCP3SRDX), a member of TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, and PCF (TCP) transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana, resulted in the formation of ectopic shoots on cotyledons and various defects in organ development. Expression of TCP3SRDX induced ectopic expression of boundary-specific genes, namely the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON (CUC) genes, and suppressed the expression of miR164, whose product cleaves the transcripts of CUC genes. This abnormal phenotype was substantially reversed on the cuc1 mutant background. By contrast, gain of function of TCP3 suppressed the expression of CUC genes and resulted in the fusion of cotyledons and defects in formation of shoots. The pattern of expression of TCP3 did not overlap with that of the CUC genes. In addition, we found that eight TCPs had functions similar to that of TCP3. Our results demonstrate that the TCP transcription factors play a pivotal role in the control of morphogenesis of shoot organs by negatively regulating the expression of boundary-specific genes.

Figures

Abnormal Phenotype of Various Organs…

Abnormal Phenotype of Various Organs Induced by TCP3SRDX. (A) Schematic representation of the…

Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of…

Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Wild-Type and 35S:TCP3SRDX Shoot Lateral Organs. (A) and…

Phenotype of Pro TCP3 :TCP3SRDX…

Phenotype of Pro TCP3 :TCP3SRDX Plants. (A) and (B) Seedlings with irregular differentiation…

The Effects of TCP3SRDX on…

The Effects of TCP3SRDX on the Pattern of Expression of Boundary-Specific Genes and…

TCP3SRDX Suppressed the Accumulation of…

TCP3SRDX Suppressed the Accumulation of miR164. (A) RNA gel blot analysis for the…

Mutations in CUC Genes Suppressed…

Mutations in CUC Genes Suppressed the Activity of TCP3SRDX. (A) A 35S:TCP3SRDX L…

Gain of Function of TCP3 Activity Inhibited Formation of Shoots. (A) and (B)…

Expression of TCP Genes. (A)…

Expression of TCP Genes. (A) to (E) Detection by in situ hybridization of…


Contents

Spiders, unlike insects, have only two main body parts (tagmata) instead of three: a fused head and thorax (called a cephalothorax or prosoma) and an abdomen (also called an opisthosoma). The exception to this rule are the assassin spiders in the family Archaeidae, whose cephalothorax is divided into two parts by an elongated "neck". In the majority of spiders, the abdomen is not externally segmented. The exception is the Liphistiidae, a basal family, which retains this more primitive character hence they are sometimes called segmented spiders. The abdomen and cephalothorax are connected by a thin waist called the pedicel. Unlike insects, spiders have an endoskeleton in addition to their exoskeleton. [2]

Cephalothorax Edit

The cephalothorax, also called prosoma, is composed of two primary surfaces: a dorsal carapace and a ventral sternum. Most external appendages on the spider are attached to the cephalothorax, including the eyes, chelicerae and other mouthparts, pedipalps and legs.

Like other arachnids, spiders are unable to chew their food, so they have a mouth part shaped like a short drinking straw that they use to suck up the liquefied insides of their prey. However, they are able to eat their own silk to recycle proteins needed in the production of new spider webs. [3] Some spiders, such as the dewdrop spiders (Argyrodes), even eat the silk of other spider species. [4]

Appendages Edit

Spiders typically have eight walking legs (insects have six). They do not have antennae the pair of appendages in front of the legs are the pedipalps (or just palps). Spiders' legs are made up of seven segments. Starting from the body end, these are the coxa, trochanter, femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus and tarsus. The tip of the tarsus bears claws, which vary in number and size. Spiders that spin webs typically have three claws, the middle one being small hunting spiders typically have only two claws. Since they do not have antennae, spiders use specialised and sensitive setae on their legs to pick up scent, sounds, vibrations and air currents. [5] Some spiders, such as the Australian crab spider, do not have claws.

The pedipalps have only six segments: the metatarsus is missing. In adult males, the tarsus of each palp is modified to carry an elaborate and often species-specific structure used for mating (variously called a palpal bulb, palpal organ or copulatory bulb). [6] The basal segments of the pedipalps, the coxae, next to the mouth, are modified to assist with feeding, and are termed maxillae, although they are not homologous with the maxillae of mandibulate arthropods. In mesothele and mygalomorph spiders, the maxillae are only slightly modified in araneomorph spiders, the anterior edge is often saw-like and is used in cutting up prey. [7]

Eyes, vision, and sense organs Edit

Spiders usually have eight eyes, each with a single lens rather than multiple units as in the compound eyes of insects. The specific arrangement of the eyes is one of the features used in classifying different species. Most species of the Haplogynae have six eyes, although some have eight (Plectreuridae), four (e.g., Tetrablemma) or even two (most Caponiidae). Sometimes one pair of eyes is better developed than the rest, or even, in some cave species, there are no eyes at all. Several families of hunting spiders, such as jumping spiders and wolf spiders, have fair to excellent vision. The main pair of eyes in jumping spiders even sees in color. [8]

Net-casting spiders of genus Deinopis have their posterior median eyes enlarged into large forward-facing compound lenses. These eyes have a wide field of view and are able to gather available light more efficiently than the eyes of cats and owls. This is despite the fact that they lack a reflective layer (tapetum lucidum) instead, each night, a large area of light-sensitive membrane is manufactured within the eyes, and since arachnid eyes do not have irises, it is rapidly destroyed again at dawn. [9]

However, most spiders that lurk on flowers, webs, and other fixed locations waiting for prey tend to have very poor eyesight instead they possess an extreme sensitivity to vibrations, which aids in prey capture. Vibration sensitive spiders can sense vibrations from such various mediums as the water surface, the soil or their silk threads. Changes in the air pressure can also be detected in search of prey.

Pedicel Edit

The cephalothorax is joined to the abdomen by a thin flexible pedicel. This allows a spider to move its abdomen in all directions, and thus, for example, to spin silk without moving the cephalothorax. This waist is actually the last segment (somite) of the cephalothorax (the pregenital somite) and is lost in most other members of the Arachnida (in scorpions it is only detectable in the embryos).

Abdomen Edit

The abdomen is also known as the opisthosoma. On the ventral side of the abdomen are two hardened plates covering the book lungs. These are called the epigastric plates. A fold, known as the epigastric furrow, separates the region of the book lungs and epigyne from the more posterior part of the abdomen. In the middle of this furrow is the opening of the oviduct (in females) and at either end are the lung slits. [10]

Spinnerets Edit

The abdomen has no appendages except from one to four (usually three) modified pairs of movable telescoping organs called spinnerets, which produce silk. Originally, the common ancestor of spiders had four pairs of spinnerets, with two pairs on the tenth body segment and two pairs on the eleventh body segment, located in the middle on the ventral side of the abdomen. The suborder Mesothelae is unique in having only two types of silk glands – thought to be the ancestral condition. All other spiders have the spinnerets further towards the posterior end of the body where they form a small cluster, and the anterior central spinnerets on the tenth segment are lost or reduced (suborder Mygalomorphae), or modified into a specialised and flattened plate called the cribellum (suborder Araneomorphae). The cribellum (usually separated into a left and a right half) produces a thread made up of hundreds to thousands of very fine dry silk fibers (about 10 nm thick) around a few thicker core fibers, which then are combed into a woolly structure by using a group of specialized hairs (setae) on their fourth pair of legs. It is suspected their woolly silk is charged with static electricity, causing its fine fibres to attach to trapped prey. Once all araneomorph (modern) spiders had a cribellum, but today it only remains in the cribellate spiders (although it is sometimes missing even here), which are widespread around the world. Often, this plate lacks the ability to produce silk, and is then called the colulus an organ that zoologists have not identified a function for. The colulus is reduced or absent in most species. The cribellate spiders were the first spiders to build specialized prey catching webs, later evolving into groups that used the spinnerets solely to make webs, instead using silk threads dotted with droplets of a sticky liquid (like pearls on a necklace) to capture small arthropods, and a few large species even small bats and birds. Other spiders do not build webs at all, but have become active hunters, like the highly successful jumping spiders.

Circulation Edit

Spiders, like most arthropods, have an open circulatory system, i.e., they do not have true blood, or veins which transport it. Rather, their bodies are filled with haemolymph, which is pumped through arteries by a heart into spaces called sinuses surrounding their internal organs. The haemolymph contains hemocyanin, a respiratory protein similar in function to hemoglobin. Hemocyanin contains two copper atoms, tinting the haemolymph with a faint blue color. [11]

The heart is located in the abdomen a short distance within the middle line of the dorsal body-wall, and above the intestine. Unlike in insects, the heart is not divided into chambers, but consists of a simple tube. The aorta, which supplies haemolymph to the cephalothorax, extends from the anterior end of the heart. Smaller arteries extend from sides and posterior end of the heart. A thin-walled sac, known as the pericardium, completely surrounds the heart. [12]

Breathing Edit

Spiders have developed several different respiratory anatomies, based either on book lungs or on tracheae. Mesothele and mygalomorph spiders have two pairs of book lungs filled with haemolymph, where openings on the ventral surface of the abdomen allow air to enter and oxygen to diffuse in and carbon dioxide to diffuse out. This is also the case for some basal araneomorph spiders like the family Hypochilidae, but the remaining members of this group have just the anterior pair of book lungs intact while the posterior pair of breathing organs are partly or fully modified into tracheae, through which oxygen is diffused into the haemolymph or directly to the tissue and organs. This system has most likely evolved in small ancestors to help resist desiccation. The trachea were originally connected to the surroundings through a pair of spiracles, but in the majority of spiders this pair of spiracles has fused into a single one in the middle, and migrated posterior close to the spinnerets.

Among smaller araneomorph spiders there are species in which the anterior pair of book lungs have also evolved into tracheae, or are simply reduced or missing. In a very few species the book lungs have developed deep channels, apparently signs of evolution into tracheae. Some very small spiders in moist and sheltered habitats do not have any breathing organs at all, as gas exchange occurs directly through their body surface. In the tracheal system oxygen interchange is much more efficient, enabling cursorial hunting (hunting involving extended pursuit) and other advanced characteristics, such as having a smaller heart and the ability to live in drier habitats.

Digestion Edit

Digestion is carried out internally and externally. Spiders do not have powerful chelicerae, but secrete digestive fluids into their prey from a series of ducts perforating their chelicerae. The coxal glands are excretory organs that lie in the prosoma, and open to the outside at the coxae of the walking legs. In primitive spiders, such as the Mesothelae and the Mygalomorphae, two pairs of coxal glands open onto the posterior side of the first and third coxae. They release a fluid only during feeding and play an important role in ion and water balance. [13] Digestive fluids dissolve the prey's internal tissues. Then the spider feeds by sucking the partially digested fluids out. Other spiders with more powerfully built chelicerae masticate the entire body of their prey and leave behind only a relatively small amount of indigestible materials. Spiders consume only liquid foods. Many spiders will store prey temporarily. Web weaving spiders that have made a shroud of silk to quiet their envenomed prey's death struggles will generally leave them in these shrouds and then consume them at their leisure.

Almost all spiders reproduce sexually. They are unusual in that they do not transfer sperm directly, for example via a penis. Instead the males transfer it to specialized structures (palpal bulbs) on the pedipalps and then meander about to search for a mate. [14] These palps are then introduced into the female's epigyne. This was first described in 1678 by Martin Lister. In 1843 it was revealed that males build a nuptial web into which they deposit a drop of semen, which is then taken up by the copulatory apparatus (the palpal bulb) in the pedipalp. The structure of the copulatory apparatus varies significantly between males of different species. While the widened palpal tarsus of the southern house spider, Kukulcania hibernalis (Filistatidae), only forms a simple bulb containing the coiled blind duct, members of the genus Argiope have a highly complex structure.


Morphology and Anatomy of Shoot, Root, and Propagation Systems in Hoffmannseggia glauca

Hoffmannseggia glauca is a perennial weed that has tubers and root-borne buds. Some authors only consider root tubers without mentioning root-borne buds, while others consider that more anatomic studies become necessary to determine the origin of these structures and to interpret their behaviour. The objectives are: to study the growth form of the plant in order to analyze the ontogeny of its propagation organs, and to study its shoot and root anatomical characters that affect water conductivity. Hoffmannseggia glauca was collected in Argentina. Development of its shoot and root systems was observed. Shoots and roots were processed to obtain histological slides. Macerations were prepared to study vessel members. Primary and lateral roots originate buds that develop shoots at the end of the first year. In winter, aerial parts die and only latent buds at soil surface level and subterranean organs remain. In the following spring, they develop innovation shoots. Roots show localized swellings (tuberous roots), due to a pronounced increase of ray thickness and parenchymatous proliferation in the root center. Root vessel members are wider than those of aerial and subterranean shoots. Early development of an extensive root system, presence of root borne buds, anatomic and physiological specialization of innovation shoots, capability of parenchymatous rays to originate buds and tuberous roots, and high water transport efficiency in subterranean organs lead Hoffmannseggia glauca to display higher colonization potential than other species.

Key words

Hoffmannseggia glauca - shoot - root - propagation system - morphology - anatomy.

References

    1 Basconsuelo S., Kraus T.. Morfología del sistema radical de Rhynchosia edulis Gris. (Fabaceae). Phyton. (2000) 69 119-126 2 Böhm W.. Container methods. Methods of Studying Root Systems. Berlin Springer-Verlag (1979): 95-114 3 Burkart A.. Las leguminosas argentinas de la subfamilia Cesalpinioideas. Las Leguminosas Argentinas Silvestres y Cultivadas. Buenos Aires ACME Agency (1952): 149-192 4 Camuñas E., Crespo M. B.. The genus Hoffmannseggia Cav. (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae), new for the Mediterranean flora. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. (1999) 47 283-286 5 Carlquist S.. Wood and stem anatomy of woody Amaranthaceae sensu stricto : ecology, systematics and the problems of defining rays in Dicotyledons. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. (2003) 143 1-19 6 Castner E. P., Murray D. S., Hackett M. N., Verhalen L. M., Weeks D. L., Stone J. F.. Interference of hogpotato (Hoffmannseggia glauca) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) . Weed Science. (1989) 37 688-694 7 Chaffey N.. Secondary growth of roots: a cell biological perspective. Waisel, Y., Eshel, A., and Kafkafi, V., eds. Plant Roots. The Hidden Half. New York Marcel Dekker (2002): 93-112 8 D'Ambrogio de Argüeso A.. Manual de Técnicas en Histología Vegetal. Buenos Aires Hemisferio Sur (1986): 1-83 9 Ewers F. W., Carlton M. R., Fisher J. B., Kolb K. J., Tyree M. T.. Vessel diameters in roots versus stems of tropical lianas and other growth forms. IAWA Journal. (1997) 18 261-279 10 February E. C., Stock W. D., Bond W. J., Le Roux D. J.. Relationships between water availability and selected vessel characteristics in Eucalyptus grandis and two hybrids. IAWA Journal. (1995) 16 269-276 11 Flores H., Weber C., Puffett J.. Underground plant metabolism: the biosynthetic potential of roots. Waisel, Y., Eshel, A., and Kafkafi, V., eds. Plant Roots. The Hidden Half. New York Marcel Dekker (1996): 931-956 12 Groff P. A., Kaplan D. R.. The relation of root systems to shoot systems in vascular plants. The Botanical Review. (1988) 54 387-422 13 Jäger E. J.. A database on biological traits of the German flora - state of the art and need of investigation of the vegetative structures. Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz. (2000) 9 53-59 14 Kutschera L., Lichtenegger E.. Wurzelatlas mitteleuropäischer Grünlandpflanzen, Bd. 2, Teil 1. Stuttgart Gustav Fischer Verlag (1992): 1-851 15 Lambers H., Chapin III., F. S., Pons T. L.. Plant water relations. Plant Physiological Ecology. New York Springer (1998): 154-209 16 Machado S. R., Angyalossy-Alfonso V., Morretes B. L.. Comparative wood anatomy of root and stem in Styrax camporum (Styracaceae). IAWA Journal. (1997) 18 13-25 17 Marzocca A.. Manual de Malezas. Buenos Aires Hemisferio Sur (1976): 1-555 18 Metcalfe C. R.. Ecological anatomy and morphology. General survey. Metcalfe, C. R. and Chalk, L., eds. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, Vol. II. Wood Structure and Conclusion of the General Introduction. Oxford Clarendon Press (1983 a): 126-152 19 Metcalfe C. R.. Anatomy, phylogeny and taxonomy. Metcalfe, C. R. and Chalk, L., eds. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, Vol. II. Wood Structure and Conclusion of the General Introduction. Oxford Clarendon Press (1983 b): 98-108 20 Metcalfe C. R.. Anomalous structure. Metcalfe, C. R. and Chalk, L., eds. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, Vol. II. Wood Structure and Conclusion of the General Introduction. Oxford Clarendon Press (1983 c): 52-63 21 Milanez C., Moraes-Dallaqua M.. Ontogenese do sistema subterraneo de Pachyrhizus ahipa (Wedd.) Parodi (Fabaceae). Revista Brasileira de Botânica. (2003) 26 415-427 22 Ott L.. Introduction to the analysis of variance. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Belmont, California Wadsworth Publishing Company (1993): 769-806 23 Patel R. N.. A comparison of the anatomy of the secondary xylem in roots and stems. Holzforschung. (1965) 19 72-79 24 Polhill R. M., Vidal J. E.. Caesalpinieae. Polhill, R. M. and Raven, P. H., eds. Advances in Legume Systematics. Kew Royal Botanical Garden (1981): 81-97 25 Sawidis T., Kalyva S., Delivopoulos S.. The root-tuber anatomy of Asphodelus aestivus . Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants. (2005) 200 332-338 26 Schubert R., Wagner G.. Botanisches Wörterbuch. Stuttgart Eugen Ulmer GmbH und Co. (1993): 1-645 27 Shewry P. R.. Tuber storage proteins. Annals of Botany. (2003) 91 755-769 28 Simpson B. B., Tate J. A., Weeks A.. Phylogeny and character evolution of Hoffmannseggia (Caesalpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). Systematic Botany. (2004) 29 933-946 29 Simpson B. B., Tate J. A., Weeks A.. The biogeography of Hoffmannseggia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Caesalpinieae): a tale of many travels. Journal of Biogeography. (2005) 32 15-27 30 Simpson B. B., Ulibarri E. A.. A sinopsis of the genus Hoffmannseggia (Leguminosae). Lundellia. (2006) 9 7-33 31 Steel R. G. D., Torrie J. H.. Estadística no paramétrica. Bioestadística: Principios y Procedimientos. México McGraw-Hill (1988): 520-527 32 Strittmatter C.. Modificación de una técnica de coloración safranina-fast green. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica. (1979) 18 121-122 33 Troll W.. Vergleichende Morphologie der Höheren Pflanzen. 1. Band, Vegetationorgane, 3. Teil, Wurzel und Wurzelsysteme. Berlin Gebrüder Borntraeger (1943): 2609-2710 34 Ulibarri E. A.. Las especies argentinas del género Hoffmannseggia Cav. (Legum-Caesalp.) . Darwiniana. (1979) 22 135-158 35 Ulibarri E. A.. Sinopsis de Caesalpinia y Hoffmannseggia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) de Sudamérica. Darwiniana. (1996) 34 299-348 36 Vitta J., Faccini D., Nisensohn L., Puricelli E., Tuesca D., Leguizamón E.. Las Malezas en la Región Sojera Núcleo Argentina: Situación Actual y Perspectivas. Buenos Aires Dow Agro Sciences (1999): 1-47 37 Weber H.. Die Bewurzelungsverhältnisse der Pflanzen. Freiburg, Germany Herder (1953): 1-132 38 Westerman R. B., Murray D. S., Verhalen L. M., Hackett N. M., Castner E. P., Banks J. C., Stone J. F., Weeks D. L.. Hogpotato (Hoffmannseggia glauca) : Its biology, competition, and control. Oklahoma Agricultural Station Bulletin B. (1998) 812 39 Zanín L. A., Cangiano M. A.. El cariotipo de Hoffmannseggia glauca (Fabaceae). Darwiniana. (2001) 39 11-13 40 Zuloaga F., Morrone E. D.. Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de la República Argentina. II. Fabaceae - Zygophyllaceae (Dicotyledoneae). Missouri Missouri Botanical Garden Press (1999): 681-682

Morfología Vegetal
Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria
Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto


Watch the video: Plant Anatomy and Morphology (June 2022).


Comments:

  1. Olivier

    It is interesting. You will not prompt to me, where I can find more information on this question?

  2. Castor

    It is the good idea.

  3. Pierce

    Quite right! The idea is good, I agree with you.

  4. Natanael

    Maybe there is a mistake?



Write a message