What is meant by “alien” probe in a microarray?

What is meant by “alien” probe in a microarray?

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

In my lab we did a microarray to analyze differential gene expression in S. cerevisiae treated with UV irradiation. We are now analyzing the results and one of the up-regulated genes is labeled "Alien4_60." I believe this is some kind of control, but I am having trouble understanding what it is.

I would think that a probe labeled "alien" in a microarray would be some kind of negative control. The probe-list (excel file) says "Control stringency: 60% identity to oligo Alien4" as the description for this probe. What does this mean?

… As you can imagine, searches for "Alien4" only brings up sci-fi movies!

p.s. perhaps someone with enough rep could tag this question with more meaningful tags.

It's a probe to detect external 'Alien' RNA standard, a synthetic mRNA commercialized by Stratagene/Agilent.

The Alien RNA transcript is a ~500-nt, polyadenylated RNA molecule that is synthesized by in vitro transcription. The Alien RNA transcript is nonhomologous to all known nucleic acid sequences currently in public databases, as determined by BLAST comparisons against NIH sequence databases.

As any other external standard, you spike in the same amount of Alien RNA standard in your different reactions and then using the Alien probe you can normalize for extraction efficiencies etc. It works not only for microarrays, but also for qPCR, RNA-seq etc.

If you didn't spike in any of it, I expect your probes giving very low signal that's probably why you thought about negative controls.


  1. Ratib

    I fully share your opinion. There is something in this and the idea is excellent, I support it.

  2. Sandy

    I think that is the very interesting subject. I offer you to discuss it here or in PM.

  3. Tazil

    MMM. I totally agree.

  4. Stowe

    It seems to me, what is it it was already discussed.

  5. Stanhop

    wow! ... and it happens! ...

  6. Paul

    There is something in this and the idea is good, I support it.

Write a message